Introduction:
In a recent decision, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) denied a Petition for Rulemaking submitted by Coinbase Global, Inc., asserting that existing laws and regulations already effectively govern the crypto securities markets. The decision, supported by various key points, emphasizes the SEC's commitment to maintaining discretion in setting its own rulemaking priorities.
Existing Laws and Regulations:
The SEC contends that the current legal framework for securities applies seamlessly to the crypto securities markets. Rather than limiting the application of securities laws to traditional stocks and bonds, Congress deliberately crafted a broad definition of "security" encompassing over 30 items, including the term "investment contract." This definition, as established in the landmark Supreme Court case SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., focuses on the economic reality of transactions, ensuring flexibility to adapt to evolving financial instruments.
The SEC emphasizes that the criteria set forth in Howey and subsequent decisions remain effective in determining whether a crypto asset qualifies as a security. The agency highlights that federal courts have consistently applied these principles to various crypto assets, reinforcing their adaptability to the ever-changing landscape of financial instruments.
“First, existing law and regulations apply to the crypto securities markets.”
Registration and Disclosure Requirements:
The SEC underscores the importance of disclosure and investor protection through the registration process. If a crypto asset is offered and sold as a security, the issuer is obligated to provide comprehensive disclosures. The SEC dismisses claims that it is impractical to identify issuers of crypto asset securities, clarifying that the term "issuer" encompasses entities organizing or sponsoring investment activities in pursuit of profit.
Moreover, the SEC points out that the current registration and disclosure regime accommodates a variety of issuers and securities, as evidenced by the registration of offerings of crypto asset securities under existing securities laws.
Regulation of Intermediaries:
The statement rebuts the suggestion that intermediaries in the crypto asset markets are exempt from regulatory oversight. The SEC emphasizes the necessity for securities intermediaries, including broker-dealers, exchanges, clearing agencies, and transfer agents, to register and comply with specific statutory and regulatory requirements. The regulatory framework aims to protect investors from manipulation, fraud, and other abuses commonly observed in the intermediation of crypto asset securities.
SEC's Approach to Rulemaking:
The SEC counters the petition's claim that immediate regulatory action is warranted, asserting that ongoing initiatives and rulemaking efforts are already underway. The agency highlights the Special Purpose Broker-Dealers Release, providing a five-year period for broker-dealers operating in defined circumstances regarding crypto asset securities. Additionally, the SEC points to proposed rules related to crypto asset securities, ongoing enforcement actions, and engagement with market participants as part of its comprehensive approach.
“Second, the SEC addresses the crypto securities markets through rulemaking as well.”
Commission Discretion in Rulemaking:
The SEC underscores the importance of maintaining discretion in setting rulemaking priorities. While acknowledging challenges within the crypto market, the agency emphasizes the need to allocate resources strategically and address areas within the larger capital markets that require updated regulation.
“Third, it is important to maintain Commission discretion in setting its own rulemaking priorities.”
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the SEC's decision to deny Coinbase's petition reinforces the belief that the existing securities regime effectively governs crypto asset securities. The agency remains committed to ensuring transparency, investor protection, and regulatory adaptability within the evolving landscape of the crypto securities markets. As the SEC continues its initiatives and engagements, the decision reflects a comprehensive approach to regulating this dynamic and rapidly growing sector. The lesson learned is that adherence to established regulatory frameworks is crucial for fostering a secure and trustworthy environment in the crypto asset securities space.
Source:
Statement on the Denial of a Rulemaking Petition Submitted on behalf of Coinbase Global, Inc.
Related Article:
Transforming OTC Securities with Web3 Innovation and Confidence
Disclaimer
An offering statement regarding this offering has been filed with the SEC. The SEC has qualified that offering statement, which only means that the company may make sales of the securities described by the offering statement. It does not mean that the SEC has approved, passed upon the merits or passed upon the accuracy or completeness of the information in the offering statement. The offering circular that is part of that offering statement is at https://vdr.ohanae.com/projects/ohanae. You should read the offering circular before making any investment.
Ohanae Securities LLC is a subsidiary of Ohanae, Inc. and member of FINRA/SIPC. Additional information about Ohanae Securities LLC can be found on BrokerCheck. Ohanae Securities LLC is in discussions with FINRA about exploring the expansion of business lines for the broker/dealer. Any statements regarding abilities of Ohanae Securities LLC are subject to FINRA approval and there are no guarantees FINRA will approve the broker/dealer’s expansion.
Ohanae Securities is seeking approval to be a special purpose broker-dealer that is performing the full set of broker-dealer functions with respect to digital asset securities – including maintaining custody of these assets – in a manner that addresses the unique attributes of digital asset securities and minimizes risk to investors and other market participants. If approved, Ohanae Securities will limit its business to digital asset securities to isolate risk and having policies and procedures to, among other things, assess a given digital asset security’s distributed ledger technology and protect the private keys necessary to transfer the digital asset security.